• My Girls

  • My Sermons

  • Get GM4Missions

    (More Info & Sample)

    "This book is something. Buy it; read it; pray it; and commend it to a friend." (David J. Hesselgrave)

  • Get GM4Men

    (More Info & Sample)

    "Devotional material of this quality for men is extremely hard to come by." (Phil Johnson)

    "This little book is gospel gold." (Milton Vincent)

  • My Hymn Site

  • The Gospel

      A 25-minute mp3 explaining how sinful people can be right with God.

  • My Tweets

  • Subscribe to MTC

  • My Twitter

Dumb and Dumber: Evangelicals and Fundamentalists

brain in a jarThis article from CNN.com is an interesting read. It looks at our culture’s assumption that evangelicals (not to mention fundamentalists) are ignorant, considering factors that have contributed to that notion in recent history as well and pointing out current attempts to overcome it. As expected, the discussion focuses primarily on Bible-believers’ rejection of evolution. From a fundamentalist perspective, the article’s citing Billy Graham as an example of evangelical leaders who urged evangelicals to pursue intellectual credibility in the mid-1900’s is interesting, especially since it seems that little or no progress has been made since that time.

While a few are noting an increase in evangelical thinkers in recent years, it seems that most are still convinced that the term “Christian intellectual” is an oxymoron. And based on the criteria they’ve set, it will necessarily continue to be that way. In addition to requiring a denial of the biblical record of creation in favor of evolution, the intelligentsia are now emphasizing uncertainty as the new IQ test. As the concluding section of the article indicates, the only way to be considered intelligent in broad academia has nothing to do with academic training, advanced degrees, or being published; it’s all about tolerance:

“Evangelicals in the academy too often aren’t open to truly engaging those who disagree, said [Boston College sociologist Alan] Wolfe, who points to things like ‘faith statements’ at evangelical colleges, which require professors to proclaim Christian belief. A prospering intellectual culture wouldn’t make that requirement and shut other views out, he said.”

(HT: Larry Fitch)

7 Responses

  1. File this under “nothing new under the sun.” Here’s J.C. Ryle from chapter 19 of Holiness:

    “Our lot is cast in an age of abounding unbelief, skepticism and, I fear I must add, infidelity. Never, perhaps, since the days of Celsus, Porphyry and Julian, was the truth of revealed religion so openly and unblushingly assailed, and never was the assault so speciously and plausibly conducted. The words which Bishop Butler wrote in 1736 are curiously applicable to our own days ‘It is come to be taken for granted by many people, that Christianity is not even a subject of inquiry, but that it is now at length discovered to be fictitious. And accordingly they treat it as if, in the present age, this was an agreed point among all people of discernment, and nothing remained but to set it up as a principal subject of mirth and ridicule, as it were by way of reprisals for its having so long interrupted the pleasures of the world.’ I often wonder what the good bishop would have now said, if he had lived in 1879.” (emphasis mine)

    Denying the veracity of Christian doctrine has long been considered a demonstration of intelligence. That being true, we may as well get used to being stupid, or at least being considered stupid.

  2. I am just an Idaho redneck spud.

  3. Blessings to you, Chris, and to your ministry. Faith is the only rational belief one can have. Period. The definition of faith is what needs to be emphasized. Even one of the “Stephen”s (Hawking or Gould, I can’t recall at the moment) stated that we know less that one-tenth of the universe. How arrogant to think, I say, that we know absolutely that there is no Absolute. We don’t even know 10% of the universe. I think that, in itself, to deny even the possibility of God is irrational. To quote Geisler, “I don’t have enough faith to be an atheist.”

  4. And if it is irrational to deny the possibility of God, how dare one say it is irrational to believe that there is.

  5. I always ask atheists, “What is the basis for your faith?” “Science” is always the answer. I ask which discipline in science. It really throws them a curve. I ask if they discount the metaphysical disciplines. Wow. They can’t discuss that. What about the sociological? The economical? If science were the ONLY answer, it throws away all study of the humanities in every liberal arts university. There is way more to the human condition than pure science. Don’t ever ask a darwinian what Darwin said about homosexuality. Think about it, atheists arguing science from a MORAL position. Atheists get to serious side-stepping really quickly.

  6. […] My friend Chris Anderson cites this article from CNN.com about “Cracking Evangelical Stereotypes.” […]

  7. I think many Evangelicals are irrational, not because of a belief in God, but a denial in rational scientific thought. As a Christian brought up to believe in Science and Rational Thought I have no problems in learning about evolution, biology and cosmology. I don’t begin to think I’m arrogant to enough to understand hundreads of years of scientific inquiry without learning and reading about how that inquiry came about. I realize that God gave me a mind and curiosity to learn about the world, to investigate and to question. I believe that those who do are living up to God’s will and those who blindly follow another person’s understanding of God or interpretation of meanings in the bible from another person, are being led astray.

Leave a comment