• My Girls

  • My Sermons

  • Get GM4Missions

    (More Info & Sample)

    "This book is something. Buy it; read it; pray it; and commend it to a friend." (David J. Hesselgrave)

  • Get GM4Men

    (More Info & Sample)

    "Devotional material of this quality for men is extremely hard to come by." (Phil Johnson)

    "This little book is gospel gold." (Milton Vincent)

  • My Hymn Site

  • The Gospel

      A 25-minute mp3 explaining how sinful people can be right with God.

  • My Tweets

  • Subscribe to MTC

  • My Twitter

Can Hollywood and Holiness Co-Exist?

The following article was originally published in the Ohio Bible Fellowship Visitor in January of 2006.

_____________ 

HollywoodI like movies. I like plays. And I like television. I admit this, not because it is a virtue, but because it is a fact. I appreciate an heroic war story. I like a good laugh. I enjoy following the clues with a detective as he tries to solve a tough case. I can even tolerate getting teary-eyed over a Jane Austen or Hallmark “chick flick.” Frankly, I enjoy escaping from reality for an hour or two.

The problem is this: I love the Lord.  And at times my enjoyment of movies and television programs directly conflicts with my enjoyment of and obedience to God. All too often, Hollywood and holiness are mutually exclusive. All too often, my identity as a believer and my role as an audience are impossible to reconcile. Thus, I need to re-evaluate the content and importance of entertainment in my life. I need to raise the bar concerning what constitutes acceptable entertainment for me and my family; and, I suspect that the same is true throughout professing Christianity, for both evangelicals and fundamentalists. In his book, Set Apart, R. Kent Hughes laments that “the statistics reveal that the viewing habits of Christians are generally the same as the rest of culture.” (p. 55, emphasis his)  Something is amiss, and the problem lies more in the hearts of Christians than in the hearts of entertainers. Spurgeon made the following statement in his day: “I believe that one reason why the church of God at this present moment has so little influence over the world is because the world has so much influence over the church.” (The Soul Winner, p. 261-262)  Spurgeon’s words apply to us today as well. We are worldy, and our entertainment choices prove it. “We,” as in “we fundamentalists,” are worldly.

Now, my personal position regarding the theater puts me in he minority among fundamentalist brethren. Although I do not frequent the theater, I am concerned with what we watch, not so much with where we watch it. When I heard of a professing Christian who enjoyed the blasphemous movie “Bruce Almighty,” my question was “Why?” not “Where?” Fundamentalism has always erected a large “No Trespassing” sign at the theater door. Evangelicalism, on the other hand, removed the sign in the name of “Christian liberty,” but it did so without providing any teaching regarding Christian discernment and biblical standards. The results have been tragic, as evidenced by an increasingly worldly church. The portions of evangelicalism which once lacked the will to discern right from wrong now seem to lack the ability to do so.

Checking for Beams 

Yet, we fundamentalists need to check our own eyes for beams even as we justly criticize evangelicals. The problem for fundamentalists is that, while we have largely stayed out of theaters, movies have refused to stay in them. Televisions, VCR’s, and DVD players are now more common in homes than refrigerators. Hollywood entertainment has never been more accessible, and many see that as a blessing. Now, those of us who would never darken the door of a theater, even to see “The Adventures of Winnie the Pooh,” are able to enjoy the latest box office hits in the comfort of our own living rooms–in surround sound, no less! Though fundamentalists have generally eschewed the theater, most have had no qualms about the video store, or Wal Mart, or the library, or the mailbox, or airplanes. Many fundamentalists are watching the same things as their unsaved neighbors, albeit a few months later (which must count for something!). I have to wonder, “is that success?” Is it new movies that are worldly? Is it the sticky theater floor? Are movies somehow sanctified by being in a home where Joshua 24:15 graces the walls rather than movie posters? I suggest that the battle is no longer a matter of location, but of content.

popcornI fear that we have failed in much the same way as the evangelicals. We have failed to teach our people how to discern what is biblically acceptable and what is not. I am not urging fundamentalists to begin frequenting theaters, nor am I suggesting that our entertainment standards be lowered. Quite the contrary, I believe that our standards of entertainment must be significantly raised and taught to our people with an open Bible. I suggest that we replace (or at least supplement) our singing of “Oh be careful little feet where you go,” with “Oh be careful little eyes, what you see…and ears, what you hear…and mind, what you think…and heart, what you love.”

Although you won’t find the words “Hollywood” or “DVD” in your concordance, Scripture says much about these matters. It says more than most of us think. There is no shortage of passages that address the Christian’s behavior and thinking. Though many texts might be cited here, I am going to focus on Ephesians 5:1-12, and I encourage you to meditate on this passage in private.

What We See

Ephesians 5:3 says that a life that is “becoming” or appropriate for saints must be devoid of fornication and all sorts of impurity. What we watch is not specifically mentioned, but it does not need to be. Scripture says that sensual things are not even to be named among God’s people.  They should not be part of our reputation or conversation; they certainly should not be part of our recreational viewing! Verse 12 makes the same point: it is shameful even to speak of such things. In this area, as in others, God desires our absolute purity and holiness. The passages which address what we see and think are generally well known. (e.g. Job 31:1, Proverbs 6:25, Matthew 5:28) For the sake of space, I will not spend time exegeting them. However, I do believe that such passages are known better than they are obeyed, and I will address that issue briefly.

Few Bible-believers would argue that nudity is acceptable. Scripture is exceedingly clear on this point. Thus, much of Hollywood’s entertainment is obviously off limits for the believer. Yet, even Christians who oppose blatant nudity somehow excuse partial nudity, immodesty, and fornication (whether shown or implied) when they are being entertained. Both on the big screen and the small, programs commonly contain so-called “tasteful nudity” and carefully planned immodesty, which is sometimes even more provocative. Which is more harmful: an R-rated movie like “Striptease,” or a PG-13, Academy Award winning movie like “Titanic,” which contains both nudity and fornication? Even families who reject partial nudity regularly view bedroom scenes or actresses in lingerie, low-cut blouses, wet and clingy outfits, or strategically placed bed sheets. They rationalize that it is harmless. After all, “it didn’t show anything.” Thus, their consciences are salved, even as their characters are sullied. Tragically, once such perverse images enter the mind, they are there to stay. Such things have no places in our lives. It is time to raise the bar.

What We Hear

Verse 4 of Ephesians 5 continues to list practices which have no place in the believer’s life. Whereas verse 3 focuses on immorality and greed, verse 4 lists sins of the tongue. These sins abound in typical Hollywood fare–filthiness, foolish talking, and coarse jesting. Does Hollywood contain filthy, obscene language? It specializes in it. Yet, Christians routinely endure the basest of language and the blaspheming of God’s name in order to take in a good story. Does Hollywood contain foolish talking and perverse joking? You would be hard pressed to find a recent comedy that didn’t get cheap laughs from perverse jokes and double entendre. Sexual innuendoes are “must see TV.” Crass humor is commonplace. The problem this poses for Christians is that such programs are often genuinely funny. Notice, however, what Ephesians 5 says about such humor. It is inappropriate for the Christian. (v. 4) It is irreconcilable with worship. (v. 4) It is typical of those who are lost and outside of the kingdom of God. (v. 5) It is one of the reasons why the wrath of God is coming on the unsaved! (v. 6) In other words, God is not laughing, nor should we be. It is time to raise the bar.

What We Think

discsMovies have the power to change the way we think. That profound message was recently delivered to a vast audience. The speaker was not a fundamental preacher. Rather, he was a Hollywood director, and he was televised as he addressed a room filled with the rich and famous from the movie and television industries. The occasion was the 2006 Golden Globe Awards. The Golden Globes, given annually by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, are esteemed and coveted awards that are intended “to recognize outstanding achievements by conferring annual Awards of Merit…and to focus wide public attention upon the best in motion pictures and television.” (from http://www.hfpa.org)
So what were “the best in motion pictures” for 2005? Foxnews.com offers the following synopsis:

“As expected, it was a triumphant night for films dealing with homosexuality and transsexuality. Along with the victories for “Brokeback Mountain” [which the article previously referred to as the ‘gay cowboy movie’ and which won four awards, including Best Picture], acting honors went to Felicity Huffman in a gender-bending role as a man preparing for sex-change surgery in “Transamerica” and Philip Seymour Hoffman as gay author Truman Capote in “Capote.” (from www.foxnews.com)

So what was “the best in television” for 2005? Predictably, the award-winners in the television genre were no more family-friendly. “Desperate Housewives,” a program even more perverse than its title suggests, was awarded top comedy for the 2nd consecutive year. A newcomer won the award for the best actress in a comedy. Mary-Louise Parker was recognized for her role as a marijuana-selling mother in “Weeds.” Thankfully, the HFPA has yet to create a “Best Raunchy Reality Show” category. Stay tuned. Or, better yet, don’t.

Tragically, we are no longer shocked by movies and programs which celebrate perversity. However, the fact that these shows are no longer on the bottom shelf of the industry, but are instead the very programs which are lauded as “the best in motion pictures and television” says much about the entertainment industry–and much about the society which both feeds it and feeds on it. Perhaps the most telling comment of the evening was the one made by Ang Lee in his acceptance speech for the Best Director award for “Brokeback Mountain”: “I want to give my first thanks to my fellow filmmakers for strengthening my faith in movies–and the power of movies to change the way we’re thinking.” Although I would disagree with everything which Mr. Lee stands for, I wholeheartedly agree with his assessment of his industry’s influence. It has “the power…to change the way we’re thinking.” It exercises that power with great skill and success.

plasma tvHollywood is about more than entertainment. It is about indoctrination and adaptation. Hollywood is a master of calling evil good and good evil. It makes homosexuality fun (a la “Will and Grace”). It makes immorality hip (a la “Friends”). It makes teen virginity an embarrassment (a la “That 70’s Show”). It makes adultery adventurous (a la “Desperate Housewives”). It makes tolerance the highest virtue and Christian conviction the lowest vice (a la “ER”). It makes witchcraft cute (a la “Sabrina, the Teenage Witch”). It makes death a door to a godless paradise (a la “Titanic”).  It makes deception and revenge satisfying (a la every soap opera ever made). Hollywood is more than a seductress or blasphemer: it is a false teacher. And, as Wayne Wilson explains, audiences are “in no mood for critical analysis,” and thus, “are ripe for propagandizing.” (Worldly Amusements, p. 76) 

Hollywood Sells the World

I fear that this is the biggest blind spot for the average Christian. If we judge a film or program at all, we do so only on the basis of content: how much skin and profanity does it have? And even if we reject films with blatant homosexual or anti-God agendas, we are amazingly naive regarding the messages being taught by even so-called family movies and programs. As Hughes writes, “Perhaps the most subtle of television’s evils is the promotion of worldviews that are sub-Christian and spiritually destructive.” (Set Apart, p. 55). Hollywood children (and mermaids) teach our children that parents and teachers are unreasonable and out-of-touch and that rebellion is justified. There is usually a tear-jerking conclusion in which the unreasonable father comes to his senses and apologizes. Hollywood heroes (from Superman, to Batman, to James Bond) teach us that the ability to seduce a stranger is heroic and noble. Hollywood heroines teach ladies a View of love that is sentimental at best, and more often is downright sensual. The message is clear that love does whatever it takes to get one’s man, that there is power in sexuality, and that lust is irresistible. And we worry about the effects of sensual entertainment on young men!

Ephesians 5:6 warns us not to be deceived by vain words. Perhaps this is the most dangerous aspect of Hollywood’s product. It deceives. Whether Christian consumers are cognizant of it or not, what we watch alters our beliefs and shapes our consciences and sympathies. When looking for a biblical injunction against the vast majority of such entertainments, one need only consider the warnings against false teachers that pepper the New Testament. As Paul tells Timothy in I Timothy 4:7, godliness cannot co-exist with worldly and worthless fables. Reject them! Our text is equally clear. Rather than partaking with the darkened world, we must walk as children of light. (Ephesians 5:7,8) Rather than participating in their evil deeds, we must reprove them. (Ephesians 5:11)

Am I calling for total abstinence from the film and television genres? Not necessarily, though for some it may be prudent. I have no argument with those who simply abstain from the theater, but I am arguing that such abstinence does not completely settle the problem in 2006. I am calling for biblical discernment and obedience. I am calling for a conscientious re-examination of what we put before ourselves and our children for amusement, along with a re-examination of how prominent a place even legitimate recreational viewing should have in our lives. Such a study would be greatly aided by Wayne A. Wilson’s book, Worldly Amusements. I commend it to you. Above all, I am calling for our viewing habits to be brought under the lordship of Christ. It is time to raise the bar.

What We Love

I conclude with this life-changing truth. Our obedience or disobedience in this crucial matter is more than a test of our wills. It is a test of our love. William Wilberforce, commenting on Christians partaking of the theater of his day, states this point forcefully: “Let it be sufficient to remark, that the controversy would be short indeed, if the question were to be tried by this criterion of love to the Supreme Being.” (quoted by Wilson, p. 38) For many, the refusal to put off worldly entertainment arises from the fact that we love the world itself. We love that which God hates. Thus, many pastors are oddly silent on the issue, because they are as engaged in worldly entertainment as their flocks. As Ephesians 5:11 teaches, they can give no reproof of corruption because they are actively participating in it themselves. Similarly, many fathers say nothing of their teenager’s foul viewing lest they should have to change their own. The point is this: Our problem is not just our eyes. It is our hearts! Our hatred of evil is lacking because our love of the Lord is lacking. (Palm 97:10) We struggle to obey Christ because He is rivaled in our affections. (John 14:15) We genuinely believe that there is more satisfaction in a 17-inch box than in the God who created and redeemed us!

I make no pretense of being blameless in this area. Unfortunately, I have seen much that I regret. I have sometimes made watching even decent movies a too common form of recreation, thus wasting time which should have been redeemed. (Ephesians 5:16) Yet, I desire sanctification here as elsewhere. My standards must be raised. My beliefs must be applied to my habits. My affection for Christ must outweigh my enjoyment of ease. My entertainment choices must be submitted to the lordship of my Savior.

As I mentioned in the introduction, I enjoy movies, plays, and television programs. Some of them are fine. But, I love the Lord. Thus, my relationship with Him must take precedence and dominion over my viewing. It is as simple as that. But it is no sacrifice, for what I am losing is nothing compared to what I am gaining. In the words of Ephesians, I am privileged to walk worthy of my high calling. (4:1) I am privileged to be an imitator of my holy Father. (5:1) I am privileged to walk in love, following the sacrificial example of Jesus Christ, who gave all for me. I am privileged to do so as a sweet-smelling offering to God. (5:2) I am privileged to exemplify the fruit of the Spirit. (5:9) I am privileged to discern and do what is acceptable to the Lord. (5:10) So raising my viewing standards is not a matter of legalism or joyless asceticism. It is a matter of love and loyalty to the Triune God

20 Responses

  1. Very good comments. I have long been troubled by those who would claim my trip to the local theatre to watch the latest Star Wars epic is clearly a godless act, when the content of their video collection is such that even a horrible movigoing sinner like myself would blush at it.

    My comittment to my family is that we will carefully screen what we choose to watch, whether in the theatre, in our home, or wherever. That means careful research, a TVGuardian, and some caution to avoid being desensitized. Its a whole lot trickier than the wholesale abandonment of the theatre, but I would submit it is more effective in actually guarding the heart and mind from innapropriate content.

  2. Hi, David. Thanks for your comment.

    For the record, as this discussion begins, I’m not urging more theater attendance. I’m urging believers to bring Scripture to bear on our viewing decisions. Doing so may bring us very, very close to “wholesale” abandonment,” not only of the theater, but of this sort of entertainment in general. I’m urging us to think biblically & limit our viewing at all locales by conscientiously applying Scripture to our choices.

    BTW, the admitted inconsistency of some doesn’t make any of us any less accountable for our own decisions.

  3. I picked up the Visitor yesterday evening after church. I read the article and thought it was an excellent observation! Thanks for the post!

  4. Good post, Chris–I’ve enjoyed reading several of these.

  5. This is very helpful, Chris. Thanks.

  6. […] * For those entrenched in the “Ministry & Movies” discussions (like here and here and here and here), I suggest that you take a peek at this.  Hey, that’s one way to keep church members out of the theater, amen? […]

  7. FWIW, this post addresses the broad evangelical “take” on Hollywood. Ugh.

  8. [quote]BTW, the admitted inconsistency of some doesn’t make any of us any less accountable for our own decisions.[/quote]

    Absolutely. I am not blind to my own blindness. My view of what is appropriate seems to be constantly narrowing, but I think the discussion being taken to a place where it can be objective and biblical is much more helpful than the old “don’t go to the show” standard which is hopelessly out of date given the broad access to media in our culture. Great article BTW, and I did not intend to make it seem like you were encouraging more theatre attendance, I think it is just that you are taking that particular setting out of the discussion and making it about the content of what we allow ourselves to be immersed in.

  9. […] A few people who have appreciated the “Can Hollywood and Holiness Co-Exist?” article have asked either for permission to reproduce it or for me to make it available in pdf format.  I’m glad to do so: it is availble here. […]

  10. Chris,

    Thanks for this post. This is something I have been wrestling with for quite some time. At one point, I got rid of my TV; however, my father-in-law couldn’t stand it. He thought I had gone crazy. He immediately went out and purchased me a bigger and better TV. It is very challenging to resist the latest movies; however, I know they are filled with things I just wouldn’t feel comfortable watching with Jesus sitting next to me.

  11. Thanks for the kind comment, Mike. No question that there is a great deal of temptation, and it’s not getting any better. The “choose with discernment” position (which I hold) is biblically defensible, but it sure is tough to apply.

    On another subject…have you wondered what your father-in-law would do if you threw out your car? :-D

  12. Mike, just wondering, since you brought it up: what difference does your not owning a TV make to your father-in-law? Seems like that should be your business.

  13. This article, published by Agape Press following the Oscars, is an interesting follow-up to the discussion here.

  14. Chris,

    Thanks for the article. I understand and applaud your concern for living as a “peculiar people” in the world (and not of it). On the flip side (speaking of which, I notice you didn’t cover music, the most pervasive of all mass media — we still don’t have TVs in all our cars — yet!), I can report from the trenches that there are a lot of people who love the Lord AND love movies AND are even making some of them.

    I would recommend the book Hollywood Worldviews: Watching Films With Wisdom & Discernment, written by a screenwriter who is a Christian. I know this does not make him automatically worth reading (not everyone who cries Lord, Lord, etc.), but I think the title itself fits in with your call to intelligent viewing.

    Another book, a collection of essays, all written by Christians working in the industry, Behind the Screen: Hollywood Insiders on Faith, Film and Culture, gives a range of testimony from believers who are trying to make a palpable difference in the industry.

    The reason I recommend these over the books of, say, Robert Johnston (a professor at Fuller Seminary), is that the movie industry is just that: an industry. It can be changed in our country just as any others can be, for better or worse, but most often when people pull together in large groups to support change for the better. The book offers specific steps believers can take to see improvements, much more effective steps than, say bulk letter writing.

    Interesting you mention Wilberforce. A friend of mine is a producer on the movie coming out soon about his life, titled Amazing Grace. He and I are also working on an adaptation of Lewis’ The Great Divorce. Would you consider that movie premise blasphemous? Do you know the book? Forgive me if you have already posted elsewhere, but do you have opinions of Narnia, Lord of the Rings and/or the Passion you could share? I’d like to hear a lot more about the movies you DO like than the movies you don’t. Thanks, brother.

  15. Hey Chris,

    I like your idea of throwing away my car.

    Why does my father-in-law care if I have a TV? Good question. I’m guessing it’s because he likes to watch it when visiting. I also think he firmly believes nobody should live without one. He has a TV in every room of his house and has several recorders going at once.

  16. I think that some things on TV (ie history channel shows – some) can be benificial and helpful.

    I try to apply the following verse to my veiwing.

    Finally, brethren, whatever things are TRUE, whater things are NOBLE, whatever things are JUST, whatever things are PURE, whatever things are LOVELY, whatever things are of GOOD REPORT, if there is any VIRTUE and if there is anything PRAISEWORTHY — meditate on THESE THINGS.
    Phil 4:8

    Most movies and TV shows are not going to pass this test.

    A great book to get if you are a TV addict and frequently find yourself watching things you shouldn’t is Four Reasons for the Elimination of TV. I cannot remember the author, but a net search should quickly bring it up on Amazon.

    TV does have negative effects that go beyond just the content of the programming and we need to take these things into consideration as well. I think the issue is self-control and moderation. If I eat one cookie it may be OK (unless you have diabetes) as will an occasional clean program (unless you are led to sin or laziness).

    Problem is that we have become so desensitized by the media itself that we (American Christians), have lost much discernment in this area. I am often shocked and grieved by what I see other Christians watching. They are watching and thereby giving their approval to sins that Jesus suffered and died for. So if we are watching programming that glorifies sin in anyway, I think we are really forgetting what a high price Jesus paid for our salvation and how much the Lord HATES sin. We ought to hate sin as well, not rejoice in it by enjoying the sinful antics on our favorite sidcoms.

  17. Great article. It is getting harder and harder to stand for these principles in the church. Most churches’ doctrine and preaching supports these teachings, but there is a quiet ‘grassroots’ rebellion against them among younger members. I am in my early 30s and have yet to find five people my age in the church who agree with me. There is an unprecedented acceptance of these types of movies and TV shows in the church evidenced not only by the fact that Christians are watching them, but the fact that many Christians now own the ‘DVD box set’ for them too.

  18. […] Can Hollywood and Holiness Co-Exist? […]

  19. […] Iron. I found it a welcome addition to the thoughts expressed by Pastor Chris Anderson in “Can Holiness and Hollywood Co-exist?” It has always seemed strange that so many who claim to know Christ have no problem with […]

  20. There is certainly a great deal to find out about this topic.

    I really like all the points you’ve made.

Leave a comment